On Wed Apr 10, 2002 at 06:02:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > #include <hallo.h> > > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM: > > > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of > > > booting the installation system. > > > > a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability > > of reading iso9660. Show me one failure (caused not by general > > problems, i.e. with some laptops not beeing able to boot _any_ > > mkisofs-made cdrom) and I will shut up. > > The burden of proof is on you, who want to make a change with such broad > effect so late in the release cycle. I have never even tried isolinux, > while I have used syslinux many times.
Other distros (such as slackware and mandrake) are already using isolinux in their installers. I don't hear too many people complaining that those distro fail to boot from CD... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
