On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:23:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include <hallo.h> > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM: > > 10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of > > booting the installation system. > > a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability > of reading iso9660. Show me one failure (caused not by general > problems, i.e. with some laptops not beeing able to boot _any_ > mkisofs-made cdrom) and I will shut up.
The burden of proof is on you, who want to make a change with such broad effect so late in the release cycle. I have never even tried isolinux, while I have used syslinux many times. > b) You can insert another CD and boot, if you got problems. I am sure > most people will do anyways. Exactly the same argument can be made for putting isolinux on the second CD. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
