Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200): > Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2021-07-23): > > Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200): > > > From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a > > > non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather > > > > arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release, > > since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this > > is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something? > > You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the > l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt?
Will look into this. > > > see partman-auto's recipe change *not* be included as I have no idea > > > about the scope of this change. Branching bullseye at the last tag, > > > cherry-picking l10n updates on top of it, and releasing from that > > > branch would have my preference. If that's the only thing that seems > > > fishy, I can take care of that particular upload if you'd like. > > > > The recipe changes in partman-auto seem to be powerpc-only, so it's > > also not relevant for bullseye release, right? > > I wasn't sure initially, hence my pointing this out. Having built the > package from the latest tag and from master, using -apowerpc and > -appc64el respectively, I've confirmed that the contents do change for > powerpc (which we can ignore) and don't change for ppc64el (which we > would care about). > > So happy to see this one get uploaded too. > > > Your recent uploads haven't made it to the mirrors yet due to some fun > on the ftp-master side, I think; but hopefully I'll be able to hint them > all when $sync happens. :) > > Thanks for the swift uploads! I uploaded partman-base today, I needed to wait for yesterday's l10n-sync run, to get the latest update for this one. Holger -- Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
