Hi Cyril On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in > the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly niceā¦
I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating packages recently on IRC #d-release. I now realize that's a bit longer ago than I though. To quote you: [00:00:00] - {Day changed to Monday, 26 April 2021} [22:06:17] <kibi> looks to me we have enough to fix and/or to debug on our plate that we won't be issuing another RC in a week or so, so freezing everyone (keeping everyone frozen) will only generate more requests for acks; at this stage, it's likely easier to let stuff migrate and deal with consequences afterward I interpreted that as you are sort of fine at this moment if we migrated the packages if they are otherwise fine. We should have agreed on a schedule and it was on my TODO list to ask you today. Additional note: glibc is on the list of build-essentials [1], so, according to our freeze policy [2] it would have needed a pre-approval already. Paul [1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/essential-and-build-essential.txt [2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#transition
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature