Hi, Aurelien Jarno <aure...@debian.org> (2021-05-18): > [ Risks ] > The fixes related to the testsuite involves many changes to our build > system, by letting the upstream makefiles to install the ld.so symlink > instead of doing it in the Debian makefiles, in an architecture specific > way for bi/tri-arch packages. While the changes might look risky at a > first glance, they do not change the code in the binaries, but only the > ld.so symlinks and the libc.so linker scripts. Those have been verified > manually on the packages built by glibc and cross-toolchain-base. > > [ Checklist ] > [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog > [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
No objection, thanks. Just to be on the safe side, I've built a netboot-gtk image against unstable's udebs and run a few installation and rescue tests, using various languages and I haven't noticed anything worrisome. And since I was wondering what the change was for the German debconf template, running `d` told me the package has migrated already, and it was indeed already unblock(-udeb)'ed… Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
