On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Geert Stappers, le dim. 23 août 2020 09:57:23 +0200, a ecrit: > > The win-win-win situation is > > * There is a BR that i386 image checks for amd64 host and informs user > > about it > > * Holgers good work is respected > > * BTS has only open BR that deserve attention, which keeps developers > > motivated to check BTS for what needs to be done > > I completely support Holgers' good work, that's not the question!
:-) > But point 3 contradicts what you wrote above: not having the information > that the bug was already reported 4 years ago gives a wrong signal to > developers: possibly we don't actually want to spend time implementing > it, and just re-filing a bug report "just because yes it is still not > implemented" gives a wrong priority signal. I admit I was pushing too much to a fresh start. Whom ever wants to work on the issue this bugreport is about, probably doesn't need an open bugreport about it. The persoon will need an i386 machine to verify that the i386 image still works fine. And also need an amd64 machine to verify that the i386 image can detect it is on amd64 hardware. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
