Holger Wansing <hwans...@mailbox.org> (2020-04-09): > Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2020-03-28): > > > This would be an easy way to publish updated installation images for > > > people to toy with, and compare with the previous alpha. And I think > > > that'd be a sensible approach (at least that's what I had in mind). > > > > > > Gathering the results and drawing a conclusion is what worries me a > > > little. > > > > By the way, I didn't investigate this in deep but I didn't easily spot a > > recent change regarding fonts in the few d-i packages I had in mind… I'm > > seeing a rather different rendering (which seems rather bad at first > > glance) with the daily build I was about to test. > > > > It might be a side effect of the recent fontconfig upload: > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1113021/accepted-fontconfig-2131-3-source-all-amd64-into-unstable-unstable/ > > > > Attached, reference image for the languages screen for bullseye, plus a > > screenshot for a daily build. > > > > If someone fancies investigating… ;) > > There is no point in investigating that, if we switch to fonts-noto > anyway :-))
I'm not sure there's actually “no point”. A possible fontconfig issue could be hindering your tests regarding that switch… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
