On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 11:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org> (2015-11-10): > > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 11:14 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > (As usual: you can safely pretend I didn't follow or fully > understand f-k > > > things.) > > > > > > Given the size of the fix and the fact the comment right above > the code > > > being fixed is explicit about the initial intent makes me want to > > > cherry-pick it right away. It might be a good idea to let it go > through > > > a bit of testing before doing so, just in case something breaks. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I was thinking to at least wait for it to hit testing first (should > do so > > at the end of the week) and then probably giving it a little more > time > > (just a week or so) to bake there too, but I may be being too > conservative. > > Seems fair to me; feel free to prod me in two weeks if you saw no > breakages by then, so that I can push/ask SRM for an upload.
I've not seen any complaints so far, the fix has been in Stretch for about three weeks now. Ian.
