Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org> (2015-11-10): > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 11:14 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > (As usual: you can safely pretend I didn't follow or fully understand f-k > > things.) > > > > Given the size of the fix and the fact the comment right above the code > > being fixed is explicit about the initial intent makes me want to > > cherry-pick it right away. It might be a good idea to let it go through > > a bit of testing before doing so, just in case something breaks. > > > > What do you think? > > I was thinking to at least wait for it to hit testing first (should do so > at the end of the week) and then probably giving it a little more time > (just a week or so) to bake there too, but I may be being too conservative.
Seems fair to me; feel free to prod me in two weeks if you saw no breakages by then, so that I can push/ask SRM for an upload. I had this kind of timeframe in mind… > > (In the meanwhile I'll be preparing a stable branch for it and adding > > this to my “next point release” todo list.) > > Thanks, saves me a job! … then discovered the fix was from July! But only released a few days ago. :) No problem, that really was a no-brainer. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
