13.11.2014 00:03, Michael Tokarev пишет: > 12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete list? > >> It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha ia64] | >> libc0.1-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [kfreebsd-any] | libc0.3 (2.19-12~) [hurd-any] > > Please double-check: > > Build-Depends: > # glibc static-nss #754813, 2.19..2.19-11, -12 is ok > libc6-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [linux-any !alpha !ia64] | > libc6-dev (<< 2.19) [linux-any !alpha !ia64] |
This does not work. conflicting-negation-in-source-relation build-depends: libc6-dev (>> 2.19-12~) [linux-any !alpha !ia64] It looks like the arch strings in []s must either be all positive or all negative, but not a mix. So this becomes insane. I'll just add a build-time check for it. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5463d95c.4000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
