On 23 September 2014 15:24, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > That being said, squeeze is EOL, so I don't see us update apt-setup > there…
Sorry, I suppose squeeze-lts is a bad example. Perhaps doing debootstrap with the intention of having a chroot of wheezy + wheezy security is a better example? Right now, that requires users to debootstrap wheezy, then modify sources.list to add the updates and security repos, then dist-upgrade in a chroot, which seems like it could be done by debootstrap in the first place if we could just let it know which additional repos we'd like to have in the final system. I feel like I must've misunderstood something though, so I'd appreciate a link to where I can read to figure out what I've missed, because in re-reading this bug, that's still what I'm understanding it to be very closely related to (except wanting third-party repos instead of what seems to me to be the more common case of wanting updates/security). :) ♥, - Tianon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAHnKnK0qtmbwkJ2D4RG07nXg9iQFd4t2EmPv=f_a9ufuppg...@mail.gmail.com
