Hi Michael, Le vendredi, 3 janvier 2014, 12.00:27 Michael Gilbert a écrit : > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> Anyway, not going to play on words because there are so many > >> efforts > >> wasted with this topic already. Again, my position on the topic: > >> "No, this doesn't belong to the installer". > > > > Thanks for taking the time to think about it. I very much respect > > your opinion. > I should clarify. I very much respect your opinion, but I do > disagree, so it would be nice to hear thoughts from other d-i people > than outright abandoning the idea.
For what is worth (as I've only been marginally involved with d-i-n-i and win32-loader), I also totally disagree that this fits within the installer team umbrella. It's not something that is needed for (or wanted by) the Debian installer at all. Also, I concur very Cyril here: we all need to wait (patiently, arguably) until the TC decides which init Debian will use as default . >From there on (unless challenged by a GR of course), it is my opinion that we need to stand behind the decision. I think people should also stop building on the fallacy that supporting multiple init systems permanently on Linux is anywhere close to a good idea. Let's spare our energies and make Debian work as best as possible with one single init system that the TC (and/or the developers' body) will have chosen. Cheers, OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
