On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 14:13:18 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 07:56:23AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > The "sublevel 6" is now in place for strings we want to change after a > > > unilaterally called freeze..:-) > > > > Isn't that a hack, given that the volatile string will be shown in basic > > installations? (I didn't check. It's possible that one needs to tamper with > > priorities. *shrug*) > > > This is a hack meant to avoid disabling translations just because > they're missing *these* strings. In short, a hack meant for languages > missing only those to be still calculated as being 100%. > You're disabling translations as soon as they're not 100%?
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
