On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 04:17, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> wrote: > Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org): >> Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011: >> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> wrote: >> > > Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds as....this just >> > > makes everybody ignore them after a few days. >> > >> > We might try to have this mail reversed sorted by failure date. So the >> > most recent failure will always be show at first item. >> > >> > Another thing we might have is a mail, for the arch, on the day of >> > failure and a summary in weekly basis. >> > >> > Comments? >> >> In principle I agree to both. The problem is that this probably means >> that the current scripts have to be rewritten from scratch. As I'm not >> really a Perl Hacker and prefer Python. Would anybody oppose if >> I'd do this in Python? > > > I wouldn't call this a priority. > > The current concern is more having the builds that are supposed to > happen.... > > Rewriting the scripts may be nice but they're doing their job, after > all.
As Christian say's it can be done but not a high priority thing. No objection in doing it on python :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikzskkvlhct4aao5jabhdfs1-fbtoa_mmfwr...@mail.gmail.com
