Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org): > Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011: > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds as....this just > > > makes everybody ignore them after a few days. > > > > We might try to have this mail reversed sorted by failure date. So the > > most recent failure will always be show at first item. > > > > Another thing we might have is a mail, for the arch, on the day of > > failure and a summary in weekly basis. > > > > Comments? > > In principle I agree to both. The problem is that this probably means > that the current scripts have to be rewritten from scratch. As I'm not > really a Perl Hacker and prefer Python. Would anybody oppose if > I'd do this in Python?
I wouldn't call this a priority. The current concern is more having the builds that are supposed to happen.... Rewriting the scripts may be nice but they're doing their job, after all.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
