(I failed to include pkg-gnome in my first mail, I've bounced it anyway; adding them for real now. Adding pkg-sdl as well.)
Frans Pop <elen...@planet.nl> (19/03/2010): > > | libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb > > This package should be dropped now. Hasn't that been done yet? I'd > consider migrating gtk+2.0 without dropping that package first an RC > bug. Gnome folks were discussing it this very afternoon, and I think they agreed to drop it. Would it seem acceptable to force the current package as is, and then fix this right afterward? > > | libsdl1.2debian-udeb > > IMO this needs to be fixed by compiling it against X.org instead of > directfb before anything migrates. As we've never actually used the > libsdl udeb (it was intended to support games), it could also simply > be dropped. Since I really would like to get stuff migrated ASAP (I would hate blocking anyone), I think we should go for either breaking or dropping it for now. Getting it built against X.org can be done afterward. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
