On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > The following packages should be the ones broken by this push: > > ,---[ Packages in sid still depending on *directfb* udebs ]--- > | cdebconf-gtk-entropy > | cdebconf-gtk-terminal > | cdebconf-gtk-udeb
These will be broken, as expected. > | libdirectfb-bin-udeb This udeb will not be broken as libdirectfb-1.2-0-udeb still exists. So no problem. > | libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb This package should be dropped now. Hasn't that been done yet? I'd consider migrating gtk+2.0 without dropping that package first an RC bug. > | libsdl1.2debian-udeb IMO this needs to be fixed by compiling it against X.org instead of directfb before anything migrates. As we've never actually used the libsdl udeb (it was intended to support games), it could also simply be dropped. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003191523.44018.elen...@planet.nl
