Hi Frans, thanks for your feedback!
On Montag, 11. Januar 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> Please file a proper BR against partman-auto-crypto.
Will do.
> The only acceptable implementation IMO would be to have it as an _optional_
> component (i.e. only loaded if explicitly requested by the user during
> anna [1]), with a postinst that then takes care of setting the password.
> The existing network-console udeb could provide inspiration.
>
> Also, the udeb would have to be very minimal: no deps on pam, adduser.
Sounds all good to me :)
> Feel free to file a wishlist BR. But unless you're willing to implement it
> yourself I doubt that will achieve much.
At least we can document the design now.
> > Again: is this is a known+reported (and still existing in squeeze) bug?
> It's not a "bug" by definition. At most a missing feature.
Which is called a wishlist bug report :-) To me, "bugs" are mostly things to
help tracking stuff. Whether this stuff is a missing or broken feature...
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
