On Thursday 25 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > First of all: can this not just be done in a similar way to what's > already been done for multipath in lines 103 and 109? If not, why?
Hmm. I can probably answer that myself: because the devmapper device names are not fixed but depend on the name of the SATA driver. Still, I wonder if it would not be possible to determine the relevant devmapper device name _first_ and then just follow the normal code path. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
