David Whedon wrote:
> 
> How about this plan, this keeps it fairly simple.  We have 2 reduced libc
> versions. 1 version will actually exists in a lot of forms because it will be
> generated for the specific requirements of a given install medium.  The second
> version will include all the symbols needed for _every_ available udeb.
> 

b.t.w are we going to use uClibc or glibc for installer modules ?


Glenn


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to