David Whedon wrote:
>
>
> I don't see that we gain much by that. To do it we'd need need some binutils,
> probably objcopy, ar, objdump. We'd not be saving much network traffic (that is
> the good thing, right?) perhaps a megabyte and adding to the complexity.
>
> How about this plan, this keeps it fairly simple. We have 2 reduced libc
> versions. 1 version will actually exists in a lot of forms because it will be
> generated for the specific requirements of a given install medium. The second
> version will include all the symbols needed for _every_ available udeb.
>
> Remeber that the installer isn't supposed to be alive for very long. Once the
> network is up we'll be calling debootstrap fairly soon.
>
Yea, that sounds like a good plan.
Glenn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
