On 2023-03-25 13:46 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 23:33 +0000, Wookey wrote: > > > The arm64 servers debian uses for buildds are fine. > > DSA often complain on #debian-admin about how flaky they are and often > have to reset them, there were a few jokes about rebooting from cron, > also the release team arch qualifications have a note about this: > > * concerns-dsa: arm64/armhf/armel: yes: unstable and ageing hardware
I still think that's referring to the 32-bit machines. I'm a buildd admin for those ports and the machines on this site and I'm not aware of problems with the 64-bit machines, and I don't get Nagios messages about them having gone down/back up, like I do about the armhf/armel hardware. Perhaps they are happenning but I'm not on the right alias/list so don't see them? I thought I was getting all monitoring messages for machines on this site So if there is an issue there we have a communications problem as well as a hardware problem. I'm sure we can get new arm64 buildds if we need them. Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
