On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:09:11AM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:22:23PM +0000, peter green wrote: > >>Each flavor of armel and armhf should have the same function, too. > >IMO if you think you can support all armada series devices that are > >likely to run debian armhf from one kernel flavour then you should > >just call the flavour "armada" (similar to the way the flavour that > >covers beagle/panda/etc is just called "omap") > Definitely, yes. Hopefully in the longer term we'll be able to run > more of the ARMv7+ machines with single kernels using DT, but that's > not going to happen overnight.
I hope we could be more ambitious and enter the single zImage / multiplatform setup early. We could start by simply calling the armada370 / armadaxp flavour "multiplatform". And then any new architectures would only be added by including them to multiplatform flavour - and only accepted if adding doesn't break existing platforms supported by our multiplatform kernel. Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130307072742.ga11...@afflict.kos.to
