Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
armada is more simple, I think too.
I will change to armada.
Thanks!
Nobuhiro
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, peter green <plugw...@p10link.net> wrote:
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, we can use same kernel.
>> As I replied to Sina, we solve these problems using DT.
>>
>> Each flavor of armel and armhf should have the same function, too.
>>
>
> IMO if you think you can support all armada series devices that are likely
> to run debian armhf from one kernel flavour then you should just call the
> flavour "armada" (similar to the way the flavour that covers
> beagle/panda/etc is just called "omap")
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CABMQnVK1ZfGo8mHhNexp=Nr4smj_k=3mus-fzzzj2wr-pko...@mail.gmail.com
