On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:58:58PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:55:25PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Could the targeted CPU be used in the name? Ie, armelv7.
> Or even just armv7. It is just a name, so it should be short and > not try to encode too much information in it. > > I would be a bit scared that this has a chance of getting out of date, > we have i386 port and nobody has an issue with 2 decades old name. Nah, people have issues with it, but backwards-compatibility prevails. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
