On 07/06/2010 02:38 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > During these chats, I heard other suggestions around a new port > notably, optimizing for much more recent CPUs such as armv7+. Ubuntu > did see quite a difference by moving all the way up to armv7 + thumb-2. >
This seems like the right move, particularly since int-heavy code won't benefit at all from this change. IMHO, what we really want is to take advantage of features on more "modern" arm cpus - the user shouldn't have to care if that's because of hardfp or thumb-2 or whatever else. Suggested arch names: armfast / armfull ? Cheers, Brian Szymanski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c338465.5010...@gmail.com
