In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Rutter writes:
>onto modules; for this reason, it seems we need a system like m68k, where
>we'd have /etc/modutils/arch/arm.{netwinder,acorn,...}.Yes. >If both the A5000, RiscPC and later hardware can all be accommodation under >one set of modules, I would propose making the sub-architecture simply >`acorn', denoting all hardware derived from 32-bit Acorn ARM machines. >However, this possibly may not be the case; how about `a5k', `medusa', and >then other aliases files for whatever weird and wonderful hardware Castle >are dreaming up (`mico', `riscstation')? Let's stick with just `acorn' for now and see what happens. I think Archimedes/A680/A5000 can certainly share one set of modules. RiscPC obviously needs different ones but confusion should be minimal - call them `acorn32' if you like. >What about the Footbridge platforms? They can all share a kernel and modules. p.
