>Okay. Should the subarchitecture be called `footbridge' rather than >`netwinder', then?
I don't have any strong feelings either way. "Footbridge" is obviously more generic and I guess it's the technically correct choice, but "netwinder" is more likely to mean something to the majority of people installing Debian. I imagine there are at least an order of magnitude more 'winders out there than there are EBSA-285s and CATS put together. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
