Also worth considering, We might not want to join yet another list from which we may not often need to seek information from. Glenn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Thibault" <sthiba...@debian.org> To: "Sam Hartman" <hartm...@debian.org> Cc: "Jeremy Bícha" <jeremy.bi...@canonical.com>; "K0LNY ??" <glenn@ervin.email>; <debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 6:13 PM Subject: Re: user is not in the suder's file Sam Hartman, le mar. 04 févr. 2025 18:03:14 -0700, a ecrit: > >>>>> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bi...@canonical.com> writes: > > > Jeremy> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:15 PM K0LNY ?? <glenn@ervin.email> > > wrote: > > >> So, I guess I made the mistake in the install to set a password > > >> for root. > > > > Jeremy> Personally, I believe that the "root password" part of the > > Jeremy> installer should be demoted to one of the more advanced > > Jeremy> pages. There are many pages in the installer that do not > > Jeremy> show by default. > > Okay, so I don't really understand why we let debian-accessibility be a > user support list, unlike all the other lists besides debian-user. > But we do. Not completely. From times to times we remind people that they'd be way better served by asking debian-user@. But they keep asking things here... One reason is probably that they know (possibly not very consciously) that they will get answers that make the assumption they are using screen readers. That's understandable, it's just not the best way to make accessibility concerns actually known, so yes again it'd be better to use debian-users even if the presence of a screen reader could matter in the answer. Samuel
