Hi Michael,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 6:06 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/09/21 21:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:02 AM Michael Schmitz <schmitz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the 16 bit / 100 Mbit patches to
> >> be accepted into the mainstream kernel. Haven't had any feedback from
> >> netdev, and the review process on linux-m68k wasn't too encouraging
> >> either. That said, I have another respin of the patch series in the
> >> pipeline (need to check that this is a good time to submit patches to
> >> netdev first).
> >
> > Thanks for your perseverance!
> > We're at rc3 (i.e. past merge window), so net-next should be open for
> > submission.
>
> Quick inspection of DaveM's netdev status page confirms that it indeed is.
>
> I've so far sent APNE patches to net, not net-next, as these are
> improvements to an existing driver. Anything wrong with that?
Fixes should have "[net]", new development "[net-next]".
I usually just ignore all of that, as I mainly send fixes to the netdev
maintainers ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
