Hi Geert,
brain fade. sorry. Meant to say - depending on chip revision bit 3
takes a different semantics.
And yes, this is getting a wee bit technical. I just don't think we're
close to anything fit for review on linux-scsi.
Cheers,
Mchael
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Michael Schmitz <schmitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What chip revision is this doc for? As far as I can make out, it should
>> be fas100a? The esp_scsi.h comments suggest the tagged queuing bit is
>> for revisions > fas236. The chips used on Macs were probably esp236 or
>> fas236? Depending on the
>
> ... ?
>
> BTW, shouldn't this conversation be CCed to linux-scsi?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> ge...@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
