On 2013-12-06 10:59, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
We should increase the timeout on all buildds, I think...
kullervo just failed to build kate... while creating the kate-dbg
package.
All the other debs have already been created. Three days wasted, or
should I
upload the debs without the dbg package?
I had already several of those wasted packages on Spice. There I thought
it was due to the low memory and all the swapping that is involved when
building the *.deb. Funny enough I think all those failed at the
*-dbg.deb as well. Can this be caused by xz as compression tool?
Can somebody remind me how to increase the timeout on a per package
base?
Or how to tell the build which packages I do not want him to build?
Back then we used a unified list that were downloaded from Stephens
webspace and used by some @includes in the config. I don't know whether
this @include still works, but when it does we should use that approach
again instead of maintaining on each buildd such a list.
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
. Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/d07b294691b1f2894cf5f64b24c65cb3@localhost
