Eero Tamminen dixit: >> > Now as additional data point, UAE/WinUAE/etc. would be interesting. > >I built the test with fpu_control.h header from eglibc, using >Sparemint GCC 2.9.5 (with 2010 binutils) and MiNTlib. When it's
Nice ;) >I.e. it seems that WinUAE FPU emulation is also lacking FPUCW change >handling (for precision). > >(Hatari's WinUAE CPU core code was synched with upstream last year.) OK, thanks. I’d just say let’s say changing FPU precision is not part of the target we support. (Funnily enough, ColdFire according to the ’net has (unchangeable) 64-bit precision… maybe let’s just say precision on m68k in general is not defined.) bye, //mirabilos -- 17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so 17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig 17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig; früher warst du als nerd voll am arsch 17:10⎜«Vutral» heute bist du als nerd der einzige der wirklich damit klarkommt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1305261742130.26...@herc.mirbsd.org
