Laurent Vivier dixit: > Le 26/05/2013 16:23, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> Laurent Vivier dixit: >> >>> For the "etc" ;-) , in Qemu, I have: >> Hm, I thought qemu did not emulate an MMU? > You're right. > > I cheat : I use Qemu in linux-user mode, it means I use m68k user binaries on > an x86_64 kernel within a linux container.
Hm. I don’t know if I’d call that a valid Debian/m68k target ;-) But for other reasons. Its FPU emulation seems to be better, though. I see two possibilities here: either ARAnyM gets fixed and we require a minimum version (which would break a whole lot of installed user‐ base and be hard to detect… but I’d guess running the test program in an init script and warning _massively_ if it detects the current behaviour is a possibility), or we just accept this, support any legacy userbase, and call m68k the test case for Python’s legacy float behaviour. Long-term, the first one might be better… Petr, do you read? bye, //mirabilos -- 21:12⎜<Vutral> sogar bei opensolaris haben die von der community so ziemlich jeden mist eingebaut │ man sollte unices nich so machen das desktopuser zuviel intresse kriegen │ das macht die code base kaputt 21:13⎜<Vutral:#MirBSD> linux war früher auch mal besser :D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1305261439050.26...@herc.mirbsd.org
