Finn Thain dixit: >Has anyone benchmarked those binaries (running on the hybrid platform) >against native 68020 and Coldfire binaries (running on their respective >native platforms)?
Since I’ve seen an strace and been explained what SYS_333 is I believe benchmarks of modern-eglibc m68k are beyond salvagable anyway. Maybe a new ABI, with a register reserved for TLS, would actually be faster, despite being more generic, since it saves kernel calls? When doing a generic *nix distribution, and it’s not called Gentoo, you *need* to produce generic executables. (Which is why ARM is fundamentally doomed, as you have not only one kernel image per board, but also arm, armeb, armel(debian), armel(ubuntu), armhf by now. And with devices being outdated before they hit the market, and the market being a cheap throw-away one, I see it getting only worse.) bye, //mirabilos -- <dileks> ch: good, you corrected yourself. ppl tend to tweet such news immediately, sth. like "grml devs seem to be buyable" <ch> dileks: we _are_. if you throw enough money in our direction, things will happen <mika> everyone is buyable, it's just a matter of price <mrud> and now comes [mira] and uses this as a signature ;0 -- they asked for it… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1205190314220.23...@herc.mirbsd.org
