On 19/01/12 15:00, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Alan Hourihane<al...@fairlite.co.uk> writes:
On 19/01/12 14:38, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Alan Hourihane<al...@fairlite.co.uk> writes:
Fixed the test, as it was broken.
No, it isn't.
Then please explain what is ?
It is the resposibility of ffi_call to put the correct value in the
return value argument. That's the whole point of the test.
But it does. Just with -O0 it works, and with -O2 it doesn't because
GCC's optimizer steps in.
Alan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1831e3.5050...@fairlite.co.uk
