Alan Hourihane dixit:
> Attached a patch to fix the err_bad_abi.c failure.
Right. That leaves us with:
Running /tmp/buildd/libffi-3.0.10/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp ...
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/return_sc.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/return_sc.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/return_sc.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/nested_struct2.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/return_sc.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
Running /tmp/buildd/libffi-3.0.10/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp ...
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1635
# of unexpected failures 9
# of unsupported tests 15
> The return_sc problem looks like it could be a GCC bug with optimizations as
> it
> doesn't happen with -O0.
No idea wrt. that one. It would surely help if those
programmes emitted lots more diagnostics, to see where
exactly they fail at a glance…
> Not sure what the nested_struct2.c problem is.
… and say what they’re supposed to do, for porters that
aren’t otherwise fiffi developers. I don’t even understand
what this one is supposed to check.
bye,
//mirabilos
PS: Please don’t Cc me, I read this list.
--
> emacs als auch vi zum Kotzen finde (joe rules) und pine für den einzig
> bedienbaren textmode-mailclient halte (und ich hab sie alle ausprobiert). ;)
Hallooooo, ich bin der Holger ("Hallo Holger!"), und ich bin ebenfalls
... pine-User, und das auch noch gewohnheitsmäßig ("Oooooooohhh"). [aus dasr]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1201161858020.24...@herc.mirbsd.org
