On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 19:20, Stephen R Marenka <step...@marenka.net> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:07:57PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 15:10, Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 13:38, Stephen R Marenka <step...@marenka.net> >> > wrote: >> >> So 2.6.29 has hit sid. Anyone want to update the kernel patches? Also, >> >> what patches to apply now that we have git-based goodness? >> > >> > You can start with the ones on the for-next branch. >> > I still have to cherry-pick the others to the (to be created) queue branch. >> > I'll let you know when I'm finished. >> >> Now my git skills have been growing, I created two new branches: >> - m68k-v2.6.29 >> - queue > > That pretty much rocks! Here's my process in case someone else wants > it or wants to fix it. :) > > The only downside seems to be the 47 patch difference between m68k > and the point release or whatever else happened on top of 2.6.29. > Those pretty much all conflicted.
Yeah, that was my biggest fear. I'll refrain from merging any stable revisions in the future. > I just pushed the patches for debian 2.6.29-4. > > http://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Kernel/Patches A few comments: - If you cloned from linux-m68k.git, you don't have to do the `git remote add', as `origin' is already the same remote. - You may want to put a `sort' in the `find ../bugfix/m68k/2.6.29 -print | sed -e 's;../;+ ;' | sed -e 's;$; m68k;' >> $series` pipeline. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
