On do, 2006-10-12 at 18:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > So we see that aranym-amd64 and aranym-i386 are about the same > > > speed, that crest is between 3 and 4 times faster and that the > > > host is between 250 and 400 times faster. > > > > Thanks for doing such an extensive benchmark. For testing package builds, > > we really need Petr's disk access speedups ... > > Which brings us to another question: would qemu for m68k be faster?
Heh. It probably would be. I once started an m68k version, thinking it might help Debian. I had most of the complicated addressing modes implemented too. I got stuck when I ran into FPU instructions in the C startup code. Oh well. Kars, too many projects, too little time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
