On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:37:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > So we see that aranym-amd64 and aranym-i386 are about the same
> > > speed, that crest is between 3 and 4 times faster and that the
> > > host is between 250 and 400 times faster.
> >
> > Thanks for doing such an extensive benchmark. For testing package builds,
> > we really need Petr's disk access speedups ...
>
> Which brings us to another question: would qemu for m68k be faster?
Vaporware are always faster, unless you point to me a qemu version that
boot linux-m68k!
Here the results for qemu-arm (syscall emulation).
MPQS galois
aranym-amd64 67,260 ms. 31,080 ms
qemuarm-i386 1,714 ms 776 ms
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
