On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:15:07AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I've successfully built gmp with -O0 and adding /usr/lib/libc.so to the > > $libs in libtool to resolve the linker error. It passed all of its > > self-tests, which seem extensive. > > > > Should I upload gmp or just use it to try to build the latest gcc-4.1? > > Perhaps do that, and then see whether using gcc-4.1 to build it again > works without any of those hacks? If it doesn't, you can still upload > it; but if it does, then you have a less ugly build at least.
Looking over the dep-wait situation, I think I'm tempted to go ahead and upload gmp, then do a binNMU of it later if the new gcc can built it straight up. At least twelve packages are directly dep-waited on gmp and at least that many more are indirectly blocked. Any objections? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
