On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2004-09-10 at 21:57, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > - Are sys_sched_[gs]etaffinity() needed for non-SMP? > Not really > > > - I disabled [sg]et_thread_area() since sys_[gs]et_thread_area() are > > missing. Do we have to implement them, or should we use some other > > method for Thread Local Storage? > > Up to your implementation > > > - What about sys_vserver()?
I would be happy to add a syscall reservation to the list of already reserved syscalls for i386, x86_64, s390, sparc/64, sh3/4, ppc/64 and mips * ... > Vserver project - probably dead for 2.6 since the SELinux and other > security modules can implement this same things (and a 2.6 vserver one > assumes would do likewise) sorry, SELinux and friends can and do not even remotely implement the same functionality, and linux-vserver for 2.6 is working fine ... best, Herbert > > - What about sys_kexec_load()? > > Depends if you support kexec > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
