also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@debian.org> [2015-07-15 15:11 +0200]: > Looking at the page we have no clue that the organization is > independent from DebConf. And I wouldn't be surprised if 100% of > people think it is not, since it will happen during debcamp, in > the same venue, and announced inside our website.
How about I add an explicit note at the top that this is independent? > What I think is problematic about this is that our teams have no > voice in how the workshop is structured, and it will be seen as > part of our work, which is not true. This applies to every single event at DebConf btw., i.e. if Jane Doe organises a BoF, it's seen as part of DebConf and yet you have no voice in it. > This is a completely new thing for me (and probably for many other > people) so please do not publish anything before we have enough > people engaged in the discussion. What sort of discussion? About the content/structure of the workshop? Or about whether this can be organised in the context of DebConf15 and advertised as a loose part of it? -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
