On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote:
> 1) name of the psuedopackage > > Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case. Correct. > 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for > (suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) Problems and requests related to the DebConf Summit instance > 3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will > receive mail related to that mailing list Unsure; the general list may be too spammy, yet we would ideally want to avoid Yet Another Mailing List. Can we just add ourselves with personal addresses for now? Initially: cate@d.o e...@zhevny.com richih@d.o stefanor@d.o > I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have > been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this > pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that > the pseudopackage will be used. https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#DC15_wishlist > Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be > available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen, > that seems fine.] Interesting and obvious in hindsight. I agree that this name should be rather safe, though. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
