Brian Gupta <brian.gu...@brandorr.com> writes: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: >> Hi Gerald, >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:08:22AM -0700, Gerald Turner wrote: >>> Richard Hartmann <richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> writes: >>> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <bkere...@ubuntu.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> I would say that there are lots of policies and rules that >>> >> Debconf attendees need to comply with to travel to the U.S. that >>> >> they may not agree with. I'm certain their policy is just along >>> >> the lines of covering them for any possible liability and about >>> >> appropriate conduct. >>> > >>> > WIthout wanting to bikeshed, wouldn't the pragmatic approach be to >>> > request a copy and go through it instead of making largely >>> > baseless assumptions? >>> >>> Here is Puppet Labs Code of Conduct: >>> >>> >>> http://docs.puppetlabs.com/community/community_guidelines.html#event-code-of-conduct >>> >>> Yesterday I got a reply from Puppet Labs, looks like they'll accept >>> an export of our summit data rather than have us use Eventbrite, and >>> also looks like they agree that our CoC and their CoC are in >>> alignment ("For the most part, I feel they are in sync"). >> >> One thing I'm concerned about is whether attendees are going to be >> upset about disclosing their personal information to Puppet Labs in >> this way. Of course it's preferable over having to share it with an >> external third party (event brite), but in that case at least the >> people choosing to attend the C&W party are in control of what data >> is shared. What is the overall thinking here about the data we'll >> export? >> >> AIUI, PuppetLabs wants name and email for the people attending (they >> also want physical address, but we explained this wasn't available >> and they were ok with it). Should we try to insist on only giving >> them names, since they have no reason to contact people by email >> afterwards? They mostly just want a headcount, right? > > I personally feel that in this case, that giving the names people > registered with may be ok, since without email addresses, it's not > really that "exploitable", nor is it unreasonable to have a list of > names at the door, to manage headcount. IE: The request makes sense. > > I would say that we should perhaps see if we can negotiate some method > for a few late adds, in the event someone's plans change, and want to > attend. (Unless it's a capacity issue.) (We'll still tell people it's > mandatory to RSVP). > > That said, without further explanation as to why they want/need email > addresses, I don't think we should share them. (I can't think of an > obvious reason that they'd want them, that I'd find agreeable, but I > may be missing something.) > >> Strawman: >> >> - add a C&W party sign-up checkbox to the website >> - include a disclaimer letting people know their name and email will >> be shared with PuppetLabs as the event host >> - include a pointer to the CoC >> - send out a mail to debconf-announce the week of the conference (no >> earlier!) with sign-up instructions and a stated deadline >> >> Is this in line with what other people are expecting here?
Update (good news): We decided¹ to go with Steve's Strawman idea. Puppet Labs will accept names-only (no email addresses). However Puppet Labs needs the export two business days before the event which would be Thursday August 21st. ¹ http://meetbot.debian.net/debconf-team/2014/debconf-team.2014-07-29-18.58.html -- Gerald Turner <gtur...@unzane.com> Encrypted mail preferred! OpenPGP: 4096R / CA89 B27A 30FA 66C5 1B80 3858 EC94 2276 FDB8 716D
pgpdqGV5W4FZ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
