Hi "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <f...@funlabs.org> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi, > > On 14/05/14 01:53, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: >> "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <f...@funlabs.org> writes: > >>> On Friday night or Saturday, I will send the initial instructions >>> about what we have to do and what is our common rules. >> >> Which process do you intend to use? I much prefered the process we used >> last year to the penta based rating the previous year. I don't know if >> summit has any facility to help with the process at all. > > Nothing really special or much different from previous years. > > Summit has a similar rating system, the main difference is that we will > try to use only one "ranking score" for both travel and food/accommodation, > instead of two (one for travel and another for food/accommodation). > I don't think we ever did scores for food/accomodation. This has as long as I've been involved always been a simple yes/no decision to sort out completely unreasonable requests (people not involved with Debian and/or Free Software at all that nobody knows). For travel sponsorship penta had two scores (involvement in Debian and amount requested IIRC). But these have been a bit confusing, so yes the general consensus in the past has been that only one dimension of rating would be better. Is that what you mean? > >> Last year there was also an idea to do condorcet voting on the requests >> which sounded like a nice idea. The idea is that every member of the >> team assembles a (partial) ordering of the requests and we run that >> through condorcet to get the list of sponsored people. > > The idea is interesting, but I believe it is too late for us to try > it. I don't think it's too late. The idea was IIRC mainly proposed by Steve. Mabe he can comment a bit more on it. Gaudenz > > >> We did not do that in the end, because the total amount of available >> money was bigger than the amount of sponsorship requested. So we only >> sorted out unreasonable request. > > Unfortunately, we are not that lucky this year, the total amount of > sponsorship requested is greater than our budget, so we will have to > go thru the score and ranking process. > > Kind regards, > - -- > Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <f...@funlabs.org> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTdxQ9AAoJEMa4WYSFUi4t0tgP/0bb7yJefxGvy1A7vKb07WOv > EyxIdhGn/0ao/5jUBlduexKU42F+Cxl4V8XTxyDeUF6qyNdI+HfN5nBdzkXLlocc > V/bkfCjaQ6lDag7Ljw8QFJ2X2vNX/476eYcMFSrUqRSJAlH/nvi+hbGHoIjq1d7Z > E8GPR33NG291ETBN39yOTIMw4ZaMyq1HqfKwsAQ/Wiq/jRPSi0TFQTLmLTLnHSZo > l72qOr5+BG6ua0gGoITUCxQOG1XcIyN6XtVXumwZhndeMSgfS3lxU3TSbQLH4W37 > 7co4GahBFOiDS+rdEx3chzpiHgGNFPJFcvO5kFsK6tVJxzGr+0OBI3yN9hyq66p2 > pZNvvQaKzYU19EpJl04R5q/EEWFeGxlhUhmBFsDV2VUDgDq/J5GaUsLa5eTpZ5yB > qBmuPGr+S3Gu24Dir0zhDJ2rTnU2opZAu/cAwGQPJjfEaLngRU/KxedpvOz30H7C > mtzr9wfIS0fnQcoGEqHXQiI+uoVsA0zH1jeawE5dWAbfWZPS5hnBmPlJViN3mrfr > GpbR2DuJK+OxFzCFNRxprI/fROBL8MEvZgzWW53Wu/SMeR6SOXYXyTGLuOpWrYJh > eeMbnv6GeurwqO0H9pR4N3EWO00/CQ/usOJ0rJS069sBbs2pYdOEt2moa8KrKrN6 > lZl+3jI8+wkMHmyaLoG4 > =UidC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
