On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Philipp Hug <deb...@hug.cx> wrote: > If we had DebConf15 chairs, they could be involved from the beginning > without having to bother about DC14 at the same time
This would make sense, imo. This is something the chairs could decide by themselves. I also note that for whatever reasons, chairs are absent from these discussions. As an aside: Tighter feedback loops would generally make some things easier. As it is, it feels a bit as if DC15 team is working on something, reaches consensus, presents consensus and only _then_ do we get broad feedback (and most of it dissent (though silence from the rest can often mean agreement)). This may be a bit in the nature of teams working somewhat independently and then reporting back, but it still feels less efficient than possible. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
