On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:44 PM, martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org> wrote:


> Realistically speaking, we're hardly ever going to meet in person,
> but online, because we are not all based in the same city. It might
> make sense to make in-person meetings require a quorum and let IRC
> meetings always be quorate.
>

Not a bad point.


Because otherwise, the people in Munich (where the Verein is based)
> could pretty much do whatever they want, knowing that the rest of
> the Verein will not be able to just travel to Munich.
>

At least the dissolving of the Verein needs prior notice, but you are
right. The Munich Cabal of Cabals of Cabals could, in theory, no
pre-annouce stuff and then force it through.


> I won't be opposed to it, but I really can't work any more on this
> and we should no longer delay sending it in to the authorities…
>

If we can agree that this is worthwhile, I can put something in a branch
which can (or can not) be merged.


>
> > Text like "einer den Mitgliedern des Vereins vertrauenswuerdigen
> > Person" might fit the bill, here.
>
> I do not think it is possible for all members to all trust one and
> the same other person.
>

That would be the legal blah with an internal understanding that this
refers to Secretary, a TO, or a public mailing list.


Richard
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to