Le mardi, 23 juillet 2013 20.05:41, Steve Langasek a écrit : > I understand the frustration at revisiting such questions if it > appears that nothing has changed.
That's the core point indeed. I really suffer (but that might be just me) from the permanent revisiting of questions that plagues the DebConf organisation; it leaves no secure ground to base things on as everything is always potentially under discussion. That makes things really painful to organize and coordinate as you never now which carpet might drop from under your feet. (That should probably be discussed in personam at DebConf for next editions). > But appeals to authority like this - and like those that have been > used to suppress discussion previously over the course of DC13 > preparation - are highly inappropriate. My intent has never been to suppress discussion and I'm sorry if my words went out that way in the past (it never blocked people from arguing anyway and discussion sometimes also showed me that I was wrong too). For what is worth, today's meeting minutes mentionned the following: "#info around 10k outstanding. we still have a surplus of around 30k". Cheers, OdyX _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
