Hi there, On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:01:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:28:53PM -0500, Brian Gupta wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Margarita Manterola > > > Also, there's 9 months till DC13, I would support this being applied > > > for DC13 sponsors as well. > > > > Thanks Marga. The issue is that many sponsors and potential sponsors > > have already been sent the sponsors brochure which doesn't mention > > this. If we were to make any changes, I do think that we would have to > > contact them again with an updated brochure and explain the changes, > > and allow them to adjust their sponsorship commitments. > > Updating the brochure after the fact might make a weird impression, but > you could follow-up with the proposal for small companies which either > have not replied yet, have declined to sponsor at all or are eligble for > an upgrade due to the pledged amount (in case the sponsorship team / > debconf team / whoever decides to go with it).
I am really against changing the level and the brochure for dc13 now. We had a very long discussion a couple of month ago regarding sponsorship level. Then, we decided to make that campaign with that level. Cheers, Raphaël
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
